COVER-UP OF RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN HIGH RIVER FORCED ENTRIES
Ottawa and Alberta governments are using solicitor-client privilege to hide the truth about RCMP rights violations after 2013 flood in High River – By Dennis R. Young, Canada Free Press – January 4, 2018 – READ THE FULL ARTICLE: http://canadafreepress.com/article/cover-up-of-rights-violations-in-high-river-forced-entries
• Many important questions remain unanswered
• Access to High River rights violation paper denied
• High River rights violations not repeated in Fort McMurray
• What good can come from keeping these records secret?
• Release the records or call a judicial inquiry!
32 CONFIRMED BREACHES OF CPIC A YEAR BETWEEN 1995-2010
CONFIRMED BREACHES OF CPIC: AN AVERAGE OF 32 TIMES A YEAR BETWEEN 1995-2010. May 14, 2017: Access to Information Request sent to RCMP for updated CPIC statistics. September 8, 2017: Delay Complaint Filed with the Office of the Information Commissioner.
IF YOU SUSPECT YOUR GOVERNMENT FIREARMS INFORMATION HAS BEEN BREACHED: I would ask any gun owner to share their stories with me if you have filed a stolen gun complaint with the RCMP, your local police, your Member of Parliament describing your concerns about criminals having access to your government firearms information. I don’t need a copy of your report only that you made one, the date you made the report and to whom you made the report. E-mail: dennisryoung@telus.net
RCMP: NO EVIDENCE BANNING HALF A MILLION+ GUNS IMPROVED PUBLIC SAFETY
My ATIP REQUEST JULY 18, 2017: What effect did banning of these 581,632 firearms had on reducing violent crime, reducing the number of criminal offences committed with firearms and, generally, what effect these firearms prohibitions have had improving public safety and police safety in Canada? RCMP RESPONSE DECEMBER 5, 2017: “Unfortunately, we were unable to locate records which respond to your request.”
TIME FOR THE AUDITOR GENERAL TO DO A VALUE-FOR-MONEY AUDIT!
MORE CFO OVERREACH and WASTE by Todd Brown
Chief Firearms Officers demand for a range membership can be used as a tool for gun confiscation. By Todd Brown, Executive Director, Firearms Institute for Rational Education – If you wish to get a full copy of the CFO Confirmation of Purpose letter, make a request at: http://www.firearmsinstitute.ca/contact.html
PLEASE MINISTER FARNWORTH SHOW US THE ‘EVIDENCE’
B.C. MINISTER ASKED TO PRODUCE STATISTICS PROVING MOST CRIME GUNS ARE ‘DOMESTICALLY SOURCED’ – Freedom of Information Request sent to the office of B.C. Minister of Public Safety Mike Farnworth – By Dennis R. Young – December 7, 2017
ONCE AGAIN, THE JUSTICE DEPT. HIDES HIGH RIVER RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
ONCE AGAIN, THE JUSTICE DEPT. HIDES HIGH RIVER RIGHTS VIOLATIONS – Thereby, preventing the rebuilding of trust in the RCMP and the Government in an Emergency – Complaint to Information Commissioner – Justice Dept. ATIP File: A-2016-01882 – Dec 3, 2017
885 PAGES OF HIGH RIVER CHARTER RIGHTS DOCUMENTS WITHHELD
885 PAGES OF HIGH RIVER CHARTER RIGHTS DOCUMENTS WITHHELD – The Justice Department is hiding the truth about rights that every homeowner in Canada has a right to know: Why didn’t the Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect High River homeowners from having their doors kicked in and their homes searched, and property seized without warrant? By Dennis R. Young – Nov 25, 2017
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RELEASES JUST 117 OF 972 PAGES OF HIGH RIVER CHARTER RIGHTS DOCUMENTS: 669 PAGES WITHHELD CITING ‘SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE’ https://dennisryoung.ca/wp-content/uploads/Custom_Uploads/Justice Dept. ATIP Response – High River Charter Violations – Nov 7, 2017.pdf
MORE HIGH RIVER SECRETS: WHO IS THE GOVERNMENT PROTECTING AND WHY?
COMPLAINT TO THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER OF CANADA RE: MORE ABUSE OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT EXEMPTION – JUSTICE FILE: A-2017-00340 – NOVEMBER 3, 2017
JUSTICE HIDING ‘ALL LEGAL QUESTIONS’ ASKED ABOUT HIGH RIVER FORCED ENTRIES
EXCERPT: “We have reviewed the records relevant to your request and determined that all of the information is exempted from release by virtue of sections 19(1) [personal information], and section 23 [solicitor-client privilege information] of the Access to Information Act.”
DOESN’T THE PUBLIC AND THE MEDIA EVEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW THE TYPE OF QUESTIONS FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ASKED ABOUT WHICH CHARTER RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE RCMP DOOR-KICKING SPREE, UNLAWFUL ENTRIES OF AND UNWARRANTED SEARCHES AND SEIZURES FROM HIGH RIVER HOMES IN THE DAYS AND WEEKS FOLLOWING THE 2013 FLOOD?
NATIONAL DEFENCE STILL WITHHOLDING HIGH RIVER DOCUMENTS
Access to Information Act – Missing Records Complaint – October 28, 2017