WHY GUNS ARE POLITICAL: A CASE STUDY – It is time for all of us to take responsibility for ourselves tell these politicians, media outlets, and companies that we will not stand for it any more. Because if we do not stand up and make ourselves heard we will be the last generation of Canadians to own firearms. By Daniel Fritter, Calibre Magazine – March 12, 2018 https://calibremag.ca/why-guns-are-political-a-case-study/
Please write your MP and tell him or her you are tired of being treated worse than the more than 400,000 convicted criminals who have been prohibited from owning firearms by the courts. Click on these links for supporting documentation: https://dennisryoung.ca/2017/03/10/liberals-gun-control-regime-still-missing-the-real-target/
RCMP MONITORS LICENSED GUN OWNERS INSTEAD – What do you call the group the RCMP considers a bigger threat to public safety than convicted sex offenders, pedophiles and violent criminals? Canada’s 2.1 million licensed firearm owners. While the RCMP investigates every single licenced, law-abiding gun owner in Canada daily as part of their Continuous Licence Eligibility Screening Program, our national police force can’t tell us anything about how often, or even if, they check up on convicted rapists, pedophiles or violent criminals. It’s not that the RCMP doesn’t possess the information. They do. TEAM CSSA E-NEWS | MARCH 10, 2018
LIBERAL’S GUN CONTROL REGIME STILL MISSING THE REAL TARGET! Laws control law-abiding gun owners but those too dangerous to own firearms, not so much. By Dennis R. Young – March 6, 2017 https://dennisryoung.ca/2017/03/10/liberals-gun-control-regime-still-missing-the-real-target/
“GET OUR PALs OFF OF CPIC” http://justiceforgunowners.ca/why-are-law-abiding-firearms-owners-on-cpic/
RCMP PUBLIC COMPLAINTS COMMISSION HIGH RIVER REPORT – FINDING NO. 31: There is no information to support the claim that RCMP members breached any gun safes. Further, none of the residents interviewed reported that their gun safes had been breached. (Page 66)
FIRST HAND ACCOUNT FROM A HIGH RIVER GUN OWNER – Excerpt: Recollections from his interview with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP: “I related to him how my house was broken into and how a secured box that had a cable lock on it was opened with bolt cutters. Two trigger locked handguns were found inside and taken back to the detachment.” Name and contact information withheld by request – E-Mail dated March 1, 2018
NOTE: If any current or former High River resident wants to share their story, please send me an e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
CFP – PRAY THE RCMP DON’T LOOK AFTER YOUR TOWN IN A STATE OF EMERGENCY By Dennis R. Young – April 1, 2014 http://canadafreepress.com/article/pray-the-rcmp-dont-look-after-your-town-in-a-state-of-emergency
It was $2,356,530.91 on October 1, 2015. The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission For the RCMP failed to report the cost of these damage claims in their High River report.
EXCERPT PDF Page 2: “The CAF members assisted the RCMP in the removal of the firearms; however, this action was outside the restraints of the Operation Order.” How is it possible that the 121-Page Report on the High River Firearms Seizures by the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission For the RCMP missed reporting this important bit of evidence?
ALBERTA PREMIER’S OFFICE ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF HIGH RIVER COMPLAINT TO U.N. HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: Shares copy with Alberta Minister of Justice & Solicitor General Kathleen Ganley – February 8, 2018
HIGH RIVER FORCED ENTRIES AND RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY RCMP & SOLDIERS – 2013 FLOOD. Formal Complaint filed with Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights citing four articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By Dennis R. Young – February 7, 2018
ALBERTA CIVIL LIBERTIES RESPONSE: HIGH RIVER FORCED ENTRIES – ACLRC Response to my Question: Can you think of an avenue I haven’t pursued to get these records available to the residents of High River, the public and the media? Student-at-Law – Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre – January 25, 2018
MY REPLY JANUARY 25, 2018: Thanks Lisa: I was hoping for some help trying to get around the governments use of solicitor-client privilege to withhold everything related to my request. In the case of the Alberta Crown counsel legal authorities paper we now believe is entitled: ‘’The Local State of Emergency-Mandatory Evacuation Order Police Officer Authorities’’ written by Peter Mackenzie. Who exactly was the client?
The paper was requested by RCMP Asst. Commissioner Marianne Ryan as a result of an e-mail exchange with Alberta Asst. Deputy Solicitor General Bill Sweeney who was asking for the legal authorities for the RCMP High River door-kicking spree (that caused $2.3 million in damages to 2,210 residences). Sweeney was asking on behalf of his Deputy Minister and the Justice Minister Jonathan Denis. Who is going to be damaged by releasing this document four years after the flood? What good can it do to keep this paper secret? It sure won’t help rebuild trust in the RCMP in High River. Having filed nearly 800 Access to Information Act requests and 20 FOIP requests I know how the system works. I need help getting the records I need for my research. I was hoping the ACLRC would be able to help with the research. I’m all on my own here.
Thanks again, Dennis
THE OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER REPORTS THAT THE RCMP HAS 2,840 PAGES OF RECORDS OF LEGAL QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS FOR LEGAL ADVICE SENT TO THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE REGARDING THE FORCE’S ACTIONS IN HIGH RIVER FOLLOWING THE 2013 FLOOD By Dennis R. Young – January 23, 2018
NOTE: It has taken fourteen months to find out how many pages of legal questions and requests for legal advice the RCMP sent to Justice. How many more months will it take before the RCMP releases these rights records to the residents of High River, Parliament and the media?
CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION’S INITIAL RESPONSE TO MY QUESTION REGARDING RCMP HIGH RIVER FORCED ENTRIES & RIGHTS VIOLATIONS – January 17, 2018 – Re: Policing Powers, Use of Force and Police Accountability