Letter to Conservative Party Leader Andrew Sheer, November 2, 2018. Waiting for more than a year for response from Official Opposition Shadow Minister for Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Pierre Paul-Hus.
NATIONAL DEFENCE REPORTS 2,854 UNSAFE FIREARMS INCIDENTS from 2008 to July 2018. DND Access to Information Act Response dated Oct 22, 2018 received Oct 29, 2018. Response to my Question (7) the total the total number of accidental discharges, unsafe acts, careless storage and unauthorized use of firearms: 2,854
- Accidental Discharges: 2,447 incidents
- Unsafe Storage: 77 entries
- Weapons Offences: 156 entries
- Firearms Act: 64 entries
- Weapons Insecurity: 98 entries
- Unauthorized Discharge: 56 entries
- Unauthorized Discharge Injury: 15 entries
CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY – FINAL ATIP RESPONSE: FIREARMS TRAINING, PROFICIENCY & SAFETY – OCTOBER 18, 2018 Received October 29, 2018. INTERIM RESPONSE SUMMARY: Unsafe use of firearms = 28 Incidents; Firearms lost or stolen = 1 Incident; Unintentional Discharges = 12 Incidents
June 25, 2013: Alberta Justice Minister Jonathan Denis asked: ‘What legal authority do the police rely upon to forcibly enter private property in the flood stricken area?’ Why wasn’t this Crown Counsel paper mentioned in the RCMP Complaint Commission’s High River Report in 2015? Complaint to Information Commissioner – October 29, 2018
INTERIM RESPONSE: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION RELEASED (106 Pages)
- Unsafe use of firearms = 28 Incidents
- Firearms lost or stolen = 1 Incident
- Unintentional Discharges = 12 Incidents
- Firearms Policies and Procedures
Answer to Alberta Justice Minister Jonathan Denis’ question to his Deputy Ministers: “What legal authority do the police rely upon to forcibly enter private property in the flood stricken area?” Alberta Crown Counsel Paper: ‘’The Local State of Emergency-Mandatory Evacuation Order Police Officer Authorities’’ – Withheld by both Alberta Justice and the RCMP.
United Nations response dated October 11, 2018 – Reasons 1 and 6 given for Ruling:
- Your communication does not address consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
- Domestic judicial/administrative remedies do not appear to have been exhausted, and it has not been substantiated that the application of domestic remedies would be unreasonably prolonged or that remedies would be otherwise ineffective.